Due Friday, 8 October 1999, 4pm
a) Find the equation which relates desired savings
to Y and r. Suppose full employment Y is 2000. Find the equilibrium interest
rate. (3)
b) Draw a rough diagram of the desired savings and
desired investment equilibrium. What would you predict would happen to
desired savings in government expenditures were to rise? Illustrate this
in your diagram. (4)
c) Suppose G rises to 500. Calculate the new interest
rate. (3)
Assume that b=0.3, A=10, real interest rates r=0.1, real price of capital is $15.30, real wage is $5.83, labour employment is 120 and depreciation is 0.15
a) Use the marginal product condition for the labour
demand equilibrium and find Y. (3)
b) Find the capital stock by using the marginal
product condition for a firm. (3)
c) Suppose capital grows by 3%, labour by 1.5%,
and output by 2.5%. What part of output growth is due to technological
change? (4)
The increase in labour decreases average and marginal productivity. The increase in capital rotates the curve up so that a given amount of labour produces more output. Both average and marginal products of labour increase. The production curve also rotates up with technological improvements and this also increases marginal and average labour productivity.
The Asian miracle was often touted as being generated by technological improvements. The empirical analysis attributes most of the increases in output to increases in labour and capital inputs.
b) If income taxes are reduced, the difference between the real wage received by labour and the net wage increases even though the gross real wage paid by the firm is unchanged. Labour demand is unchanged and labour supply increases; Ls shifts down by the amount of the tax change. The result is a decrease in the gross wage and an increase in employment.
c) Since cheaper capital is available we expect more capital to be purchased. Increased capital implies a higher marginal product of labour and hence a shift to the right in Labour demand. We predict an increase in the real wage and an increase in employment.
b) To the extent that future tax increases are expected to pay for the expenditures, both consumption and national savings would fall, but by a small amount since the cost of taxes can be amortized over a long period of time. If the increase in expenditures were permanent, then the effect on savings and consumption would be more severe since the entire $10B would have to come from reduced S and C each year.
1998 in thousands:
b) Using
http://www.statcan.ca/english/Pgdb/People/Labour/labor20b.htm,
Men | Women | |
Unemployment Rate | 8.5% | 8.1% |
Participation Rate | 72.4% | 58.1% |
Employment Ratio | 66.2% | 53.4% |
Cd = 1200 - 1200
r + .15 Y
Id = 400
- 800 r
G = 400
a) Sd = 0.85Y - 1600 +1200r = Y-C-G
b) Draw S and I curves sloping up and down respectively
with r on the vertical axis. (Increasing r increases the opportunity cost
of capital and reduces I, but increases the return to savers so S increases).
If G rises, then T will eventually have to rise and both C and S will fall.
This means that the S curve shifts left (or up) which would imply a new
equilibrium with a higher interest rate and less S and I.
c) 0.85Y - 1700 +1200r = 400 - 800 r
If Y=2000, then r must be 0.20. Why?
a) MPL = (1-b)Y/L = w/p
Y = 5.83*120/0.7 = 1000
b) MPK = bY/K = (r+d)Pk
bY/(r+d)Pk = K = 0.7*1000/(0.25)*15.3 = 183.0
c) (% change in Y) = (% change in A) + b(% change in
K) + (1-b)(% change in L)
(% change in A) = 0.025 - 0.3*0.03 - 0.7*0.015 = 0.0146 = 1.46%